DOMINIQUE NG KIM HO
AHLI DUN – N.9
DECLARATION OF ASSETS
I, DOMINIQUE NG KIM HO, being the duly elected representative of N.9 Padungan in the recent Sarawak State Elections on 20 May 2006, do hereby declare that the following constitute the whole of my and my immediate family’s assets:-
1) one (1) active Legal Firm;
2) a medical supplies company and a small business management company which are not very active;
3) one (1) corner double storey Terrace House at Pisang Road West, worth about RM260,000.00, still under housing loan repayment;
4) one (1) three year old Pregio Van, worth about RM70,000.00, still under hire purchase repayment;
5) one (1) very old Volvo; and
6) one (1) five year old Honda Motorbike.
Dated this 17th day of July, 2006
……………………………………………..
DOMINIQUE NG KIM HO
Friday, June 27, 2008
XI. ON THE ISSUE OF THE SONGKOK AS PART OF THE UNIFORM
XI. ON THE ISSUE OF THE SONGKOK AS PART OF THE UNIFORM
Tuan Speaker,
It is with the greatest of dismay that I receive your ruling on the first day of this sitting on the wearing of the Songkok.
While you have taken great pains to refer to the head wear as a hat, I think it is a songkok, and many have called it as that.
As the saying goes a hat is a hat but a songkok is songkok!
I have taken some trouble to look up some references in the internet but the consensus is that a songkok is “an apparel worn by Malay and Muslim men”, and it is perceived as such by all races including the Chinese.
I meant no disrespect for the Malay culture and Islam and neither is there any intention to. Indeed I belong to and am a very proud member of a party where there are many Malays and Muslims members and leaders. However just as I would respect the right of Malay men to wear the songkok, I would like to be accorded due respect for my choice not to wear it.
I think that I have a constitutional right as a non Malay and a non Muslim not to wear an apparel which is otherwise very deeply associated with being a Malay and a Muslim. I think that I have a right to determine what I should or should wear and no ruling would persuade me to otherwise do something that is against my nature, culture and conscience!
Press Statement dated 20 July 2006
In conjunction with the Swearing-In Ceremony for the recently elected YBs of the Sarawak DUN today, I would like to take this opportunity to declare my and my family’s assets.
As the flag bearer of the Parti KeAdilan Rakyat, which is a party dedicated to bringing about Justice for the People, I consider it my solemn duty to lead the way and set an example for all Sarawakians.
For too long, the Sarawak Government has been tarnished by allegations of corruption and favoritism in the award of massive multi million ringgit contracts and projects to companies owned or controlled by cronies or family members of our leaders.
We have currently in Sarawak serving high ranking leaders whose family members own tens of millions worth of shares in companies that are often given mega government projects without tender.
To restore the people’s confidence in the ability of our Sarawak Government to carry out its solemn duty without fear, favour or corruption, all the leaders, elected representatives and especially ministers and senior government officers must regularly declare their assets, and be required to do so by relevant laws.
I hereby call upon all the elected YBs of the current DUN, starting from the YAB Chief Minister of Sarawak, to declare his and his immediate families’ assets, on or before the start of the 1st Sitting of the 16th DUN Assembly which has been scheduled on 24 July 2006.
If we are not corrupt, and have not profited from our public office, then we should have nothing to hide and a declaration of our assets will dispel all such worries and suspicions.
There is nothing wrong with being rich, for getting rich is the objective of the most commercial and business minded people.
But it is morally wrong to use our public offices to give projects to and enrich our own family members, relatives and cronies. In Malaysian laws, such acts are also serious crimes punishable with heavy jail sentences.
Corruption is a serious blight on our society and I strongly support our PM’s campaign to wipe out corruption in Malaysia. I start now in Sarawak on this auspicious and historic occasion, taking oath as the 1st duly elected KeAdilan YB in Sarawak.
Tuan Speaker,
It is with the greatest of dismay that I receive your ruling on the first day of this sitting on the wearing of the Songkok.
While you have taken great pains to refer to the head wear as a hat, I think it is a songkok, and many have called it as that.
As the saying goes a hat is a hat but a songkok is songkok!
I have taken some trouble to look up some references in the internet but the consensus is that a songkok is “an apparel worn by Malay and Muslim men”, and it is perceived as such by all races including the Chinese.
I meant no disrespect for the Malay culture and Islam and neither is there any intention to. Indeed I belong to and am a very proud member of a party where there are many Malays and Muslims members and leaders. However just as I would respect the right of Malay men to wear the songkok, I would like to be accorded due respect for my choice not to wear it.
I think that I have a constitutional right as a non Malay and a non Muslim not to wear an apparel which is otherwise very deeply associated with being a Malay and a Muslim. I think that I have a right to determine what I should or should wear and no ruling would persuade me to otherwise do something that is against my nature, culture and conscience!
Press Statement dated 20 July 2006
In conjunction with the Swearing-In Ceremony for the recently elected YBs of the Sarawak DUN today, I would like to take this opportunity to declare my and my family’s assets.
As the flag bearer of the Parti KeAdilan Rakyat, which is a party dedicated to bringing about Justice for the People, I consider it my solemn duty to lead the way and set an example for all Sarawakians.
For too long, the Sarawak Government has been tarnished by allegations of corruption and favoritism in the award of massive multi million ringgit contracts and projects to companies owned or controlled by cronies or family members of our leaders.
We have currently in Sarawak serving high ranking leaders whose family members own tens of millions worth of shares in companies that are often given mega government projects without tender.
To restore the people’s confidence in the ability of our Sarawak Government to carry out its solemn duty without fear, favour or corruption, all the leaders, elected representatives and especially ministers and senior government officers must regularly declare their assets, and be required to do so by relevant laws.
I hereby call upon all the elected YBs of the current DUN, starting from the YAB Chief Minister of Sarawak, to declare his and his immediate families’ assets, on or before the start of the 1st Sitting of the 16th DUN Assembly which has been scheduled on 24 July 2006.
If we are not corrupt, and have not profited from our public office, then we should have nothing to hide and a declaration of our assets will dispel all such worries and suspicions.
There is nothing wrong with being rich, for getting rich is the objective of the most commercial and business minded people.
But it is morally wrong to use our public offices to give projects to and enrich our own family members, relatives and cronies. In Malaysian laws, such acts are also serious crimes punishable with heavy jail sentences.
Corruption is a serious blight on our society and I strongly support our PM’s campaign to wipe out corruption in Malaysia. I start now in Sarawak on this auspicious and historic occasion, taking oath as the 1st duly elected KeAdilan YB in Sarawak.
X. STATE FUNDING AND SUPPORT FOR MAUSHAN LIU SHAN BAN MEMORIAL
X. STATE FUNDING AND SUPPORT FOR MAUSHAN LIU SHAN BAN MEMORIAL
The State Government had to its credit recognized the glorious struggles of the daughters and sons of Sarawak in their struggle against domination and oppression by foreign colonialists. The most illustrious of these are Liu Shan Ban and the Chinese miners of Bau, the Great Rentap with his last stand at Bkt. Sadok, Rosli Dhoby’s and other Malay patriots’ personal sacrifices.
In the 50s and 60s, indeed into the 70s, there were others yet to be fully documented, who conducted equally valiant struggle against colonialism and neo-colonialism: Tun Ahmad Zaidi Adruce from the Malay community was a prominent fore-bearer.
I leave it to you YBs of SUPP on the other side, the benefit and credit of naming who your parties’ heroes were in their anti-colonialist and anti-neocolonialist peoples’ struggle. When you have put their names up, I believe we may join in our accolade for heroes from your party from this side of the House!
I hope the identification of your parties heroes will infuse your party leadership, especially the YBs in the house, yet untapped courage to fight for the rights of Sarawak and the peoples of Sarawak! I on this side would be prepared to join you and acclaim: these beloved past leaders of SUPP who have faced jail terms and made untold personal and family sacrifices, and not ever thinking of a sen of benefit for themselves. Upon their struggle, your party was built; and shame should be on anyone who squander away the legacy of their valiant pro-peoples’ struggles!
Are we, each and every YB in this house fit to carry the legacy of these heroes in their fight against colonialism and neo-colonialism?
Mr. Speaker, their struggles form the spiritual heritage which must for posterity inspire the peoples of Sarawak to defend their sacred rights and freedom from oppressive hegemony of all and any guise.
The Keadilan movement in Sarawak, of which I am the proud pioneer in this August House, draws particular strength from our illustrious past freedom fighters in our present contribution to the struggle for human rights, social justice and genuine democracy in a fully pluralistic society that Malaysia is and should rightly be. Keadilan would be too willing to cross partisan lines and support moves from your side to celebrate the legacy of genuine Freedom Heroes of all ethnic groups, and of other political parties in Sarawak.
Mr. Speaker, our call for struggle for social justice has been joined by the majority of the people at the very heart of Sarawak, the social, political and economic centre that Kuching is! In the run-up to May 20th 2006, Mr. Speaker, our candidate in Piasau put to the people of Miri the concept of Reformasi Berwarna-warni BumiKenyalang, drawing upon the legacy of our State heroes! Were he in this house today to represent Piasau, I may have let him deliver this part of the speech.
Today in this House, may I record my heartfelt appreciation for a group of dedicated persons who have so diligently and painstakingly preserved the historic site where Liu Shan Ban was buried; Liu Shan Ban, leader of the Bau gold miners’ uprising against oppressive taxation by the regime of James Brooke.
The historic uprising of the some 600 out of 4000 Chinese gold miners in Bau/ Tasik Biru in 1857 is well documented and needs little elaboration of recorded facts. These miners who had migrated from E. Kalimantan from around 1830, were imposed an oppressive Head Tax. Though the initial success of the revolt initially shook Kuching and the Brooke Regime, it was put down and was to result in the massacre of Liu Shan Ban, his men and families.
Mr. Speaker, the revolt reflects another point on which I sincerely request all honourable members of the House to ponder upon. When an obnoxious regime oppresses its subjects to the limit, through such measures as unreasonable taxation, asset confiscation, legally or through deceit, it may well provoke the people to desperate measures to protect fundamental rights. When poverty is widespread and threatens the essential needs of survival, then too, people become desperate enough to “chew up” high tension wires, road signs, drain covers, water meters, and what have you not! If these are not signs of profound sickness in Society, what is?
There must be a profound sense of alienation from mainstream society and total marginalization for such behaviour to become as widespread as it is now. We ask: Why are these people so anti-social? They may ask instead: why is the State so anti-social?
Abject poverty in a land of plenty, landlessness in an enormously vast land, evictions from homes, annexation of land, confiscation of means of livelihood, taxation beyond civilized norms, corruption of power, crony-monopolistic capitalism and State Enforcement Terror can only have castastrophic outcomes for any society and nation!
If any Government of Sarawak or of Malaysia professes to promote harmony, social stability and development, its utmost priority is to respect fundamental human rights and uphold social justice; be not fixated in promoting political and economic cronyism; not cling on to oppressive legislation such as Section 26, 27 of the Land Code to subserve such crony capitalist interests in future, and not actively devise more legislation after oppressive legislation.
Any responsible Government of Sarawak or of Malaysia, should on the other hand, govern for the welfare and progress of all people. True democratic choice informed by free media, right of organization and assembly, fair and clean elections are fundamental to progress, and vital to forestall popular revolt, be it constitutional or, God –forbid , extra-constitutional.
Keadilan’s political and social reform agenda through constitutional struggle, is, in Sarawak, to be integrally imbued with the spirit of the Freedom fighters of Sarawak. In time, we hope to promote their spirit of struggle for rights and dignity not only to Sarawak people but for all Malaysians!
I therefore call upon this House to support the erection of the Liu Shan Ban Memorial Mausoleum at his Burial Site at Tasik Biru, and that it be funded and maintained by the State Government. If the Ministry of Tourism is more ambitious, I believe the house can even support a Sarawak Gold Mining Museum to be part of a more ambitious Liu Shan Ban Museum Complex. This museum would be a fitting complement to the Petroleum Museum on Canada Hill, Miri, but bettered by the legacy of an ethnic hero.
Mr. Speaker, the fight against oppression of gold miners has also been celebrated elsewhere. In Victoria, Australia, the Eureka Stockade in the Ballarat-Bendigo region is at the very psyche of Australian nationhood, and inspires the current Australian Republican movement. The legacy of Eureka Stockade, the gold mine sites and museum brought them bountiful tourist dollars too.
That the struggle of oppression against colonial masters are common themes to the Eureka Stockade of Victoria State and to the Liu Shan Ban Bau Gold Miners’ Revolt, it would not be too far fetched for a Liu Shan Ban Museum Complex to seek association with the Ballarat Gold Museum. Malaysia would thus have a museum seeking common status with that at Ballarat.
Mr. Speaker, make no mistake that the brilliant legacy of Liu Shan Ban and other heroes of Sarawak is not the monopoly of my party, but belongs to all the peoples of Sarawak, indeed all Malaysians. I therefore sincerely hope that both sides of this house will do likewise in promoting the Spirit of Sarawak to the nation though their respective social and political channels!
Thus today I call on your support in this august House to take another important step by more prominently promoting a part of Sarawak history in her fight against oppression, and to infuse it integrally into Malaysian History proper. It is indeed a proud chapter, as proud as that of any other nation, for posterity and for the whole world to visit and see.
The State Government had to its credit recognized the glorious struggles of the daughters and sons of Sarawak in their struggle against domination and oppression by foreign colonialists. The most illustrious of these are Liu Shan Ban and the Chinese miners of Bau, the Great Rentap with his last stand at Bkt. Sadok, Rosli Dhoby’s and other Malay patriots’ personal sacrifices.
In the 50s and 60s, indeed into the 70s, there were others yet to be fully documented, who conducted equally valiant struggle against colonialism and neo-colonialism: Tun Ahmad Zaidi Adruce from the Malay community was a prominent fore-bearer.
I leave it to you YBs of SUPP on the other side, the benefit and credit of naming who your parties’ heroes were in their anti-colonialist and anti-neocolonialist peoples’ struggle. When you have put their names up, I believe we may join in our accolade for heroes from your party from this side of the House!
I hope the identification of your parties heroes will infuse your party leadership, especially the YBs in the house, yet untapped courage to fight for the rights of Sarawak and the peoples of Sarawak! I on this side would be prepared to join you and acclaim: these beloved past leaders of SUPP who have faced jail terms and made untold personal and family sacrifices, and not ever thinking of a sen of benefit for themselves. Upon their struggle, your party was built; and shame should be on anyone who squander away the legacy of their valiant pro-peoples’ struggles!
Are we, each and every YB in this house fit to carry the legacy of these heroes in their fight against colonialism and neo-colonialism?
Mr. Speaker, their struggles form the spiritual heritage which must for posterity inspire the peoples of Sarawak to defend their sacred rights and freedom from oppressive hegemony of all and any guise.
The Keadilan movement in Sarawak, of which I am the proud pioneer in this August House, draws particular strength from our illustrious past freedom fighters in our present contribution to the struggle for human rights, social justice and genuine democracy in a fully pluralistic society that Malaysia is and should rightly be. Keadilan would be too willing to cross partisan lines and support moves from your side to celebrate the legacy of genuine Freedom Heroes of all ethnic groups, and of other political parties in Sarawak.
Mr. Speaker, our call for struggle for social justice has been joined by the majority of the people at the very heart of Sarawak, the social, political and economic centre that Kuching is! In the run-up to May 20th 2006, Mr. Speaker, our candidate in Piasau put to the people of Miri the concept of Reformasi Berwarna-warni BumiKenyalang, drawing upon the legacy of our State heroes! Were he in this house today to represent Piasau, I may have let him deliver this part of the speech.
Today in this House, may I record my heartfelt appreciation for a group of dedicated persons who have so diligently and painstakingly preserved the historic site where Liu Shan Ban was buried; Liu Shan Ban, leader of the Bau gold miners’ uprising against oppressive taxation by the regime of James Brooke.
The historic uprising of the some 600 out of 4000 Chinese gold miners in Bau/ Tasik Biru in 1857 is well documented and needs little elaboration of recorded facts. These miners who had migrated from E. Kalimantan from around 1830, were imposed an oppressive Head Tax. Though the initial success of the revolt initially shook Kuching and the Brooke Regime, it was put down and was to result in the massacre of Liu Shan Ban, his men and families.
Mr. Speaker, the revolt reflects another point on which I sincerely request all honourable members of the House to ponder upon. When an obnoxious regime oppresses its subjects to the limit, through such measures as unreasonable taxation, asset confiscation, legally or through deceit, it may well provoke the people to desperate measures to protect fundamental rights. When poverty is widespread and threatens the essential needs of survival, then too, people become desperate enough to “chew up” high tension wires, road signs, drain covers, water meters, and what have you not! If these are not signs of profound sickness in Society, what is?
There must be a profound sense of alienation from mainstream society and total marginalization for such behaviour to become as widespread as it is now. We ask: Why are these people so anti-social? They may ask instead: why is the State so anti-social?
Abject poverty in a land of plenty, landlessness in an enormously vast land, evictions from homes, annexation of land, confiscation of means of livelihood, taxation beyond civilized norms, corruption of power, crony-monopolistic capitalism and State Enforcement Terror can only have castastrophic outcomes for any society and nation!
If any Government of Sarawak or of Malaysia professes to promote harmony, social stability and development, its utmost priority is to respect fundamental human rights and uphold social justice; be not fixated in promoting political and economic cronyism; not cling on to oppressive legislation such as Section 26, 27 of the Land Code to subserve such crony capitalist interests in future, and not actively devise more legislation after oppressive legislation.
Any responsible Government of Sarawak or of Malaysia, should on the other hand, govern for the welfare and progress of all people. True democratic choice informed by free media, right of organization and assembly, fair and clean elections are fundamental to progress, and vital to forestall popular revolt, be it constitutional or, God –forbid , extra-constitutional.
Keadilan’s political and social reform agenda through constitutional struggle, is, in Sarawak, to be integrally imbued with the spirit of the Freedom fighters of Sarawak. In time, we hope to promote their spirit of struggle for rights and dignity not only to Sarawak people but for all Malaysians!
I therefore call upon this House to support the erection of the Liu Shan Ban Memorial Mausoleum at his Burial Site at Tasik Biru, and that it be funded and maintained by the State Government. If the Ministry of Tourism is more ambitious, I believe the house can even support a Sarawak Gold Mining Museum to be part of a more ambitious Liu Shan Ban Museum Complex. This museum would be a fitting complement to the Petroleum Museum on Canada Hill, Miri, but bettered by the legacy of an ethnic hero.
Mr. Speaker, the fight against oppression of gold miners has also been celebrated elsewhere. In Victoria, Australia, the Eureka Stockade in the Ballarat-Bendigo region is at the very psyche of Australian nationhood, and inspires the current Australian Republican movement. The legacy of Eureka Stockade, the gold mine sites and museum brought them bountiful tourist dollars too.
That the struggle of oppression against colonial masters are common themes to the Eureka Stockade of Victoria State and to the Liu Shan Ban Bau Gold Miners’ Revolt, it would not be too far fetched for a Liu Shan Ban Museum Complex to seek association with the Ballarat Gold Museum. Malaysia would thus have a museum seeking common status with that at Ballarat.
Mr. Speaker, make no mistake that the brilliant legacy of Liu Shan Ban and other heroes of Sarawak is not the monopoly of my party, but belongs to all the peoples of Sarawak, indeed all Malaysians. I therefore sincerely hope that both sides of this house will do likewise in promoting the Spirit of Sarawak to the nation though their respective social and political channels!
Thus today I call on your support in this august House to take another important step by more prominently promoting a part of Sarawak history in her fight against oppression, and to infuse it integrally into Malaysian History proper. It is indeed a proud chapter, as proud as that of any other nation, for posterity and for the whole world to visit and see.
IX. REHONOURING MALAYSIA DAY
Talking about Malaysia Day brings me to another pet topic of mine. For many years now I have taken to writing an annual press statement reminding all Sarawakians of the day Malaysia was born ie 16 September (1963) and not 31 August. This day which is enshrined in the Malaysian Constitution along with the other day of 31 August is even more symbolic for Malaysia and Sarawak for on this very day was not only Malaysia born but Sarawak became independent! In the years past, 16 September was celebrated as our most important day.
Indeed on the actual day in 1963, there were some 6000 people gathered at the Central Padang to mark this most symbolic day.
I hereby call upon the State Government to restore Malaysia Day to its full status and have it celebrated annually in Sarawak!
I have begun to commemorate 16 September since last year at the Central Padang. I will raise the Malaysian and Sarawakian flags and sing the national and state anthems there every year until the State Government takes over! It’s a great shame on ourselves that we seem to have obliterated from our memory the commemoration of such an important day, indeed the most important day in Malaysia!
Indeed on the actual day in 1963, there were some 6000 people gathered at the Central Padang to mark this most symbolic day.
I hereby call upon the State Government to restore Malaysia Day to its full status and have it celebrated annually in Sarawak!
I have begun to commemorate 16 September since last year at the Central Padang. I will raise the Malaysian and Sarawakian flags and sing the national and state anthems there every year until the State Government takes over! It’s a great shame on ourselves that we seem to have obliterated from our memory the commemoration of such an important day, indeed the most important day in Malaysia!
VIII. AVIATION AND SARAWAK AIRLINES
VIII. AVIATION AND SARAWAK AIRLINES
It is of utmost regret that the state has such little leverage in the development of aviation in Sarawak in the years that it is in the Federation. The cavaliar manner in which the State has been treated just because aviation is on the Federal list, cannot be anymore tolerated by the people of Sarawak; past, recent and intercurrent aviation events are all proving the point.
I hardly need to state the obvious that Sarawak is isolated not only by the South China Sea, but more so by the Federal BN Government leaving us in the backyard of aviation and tourism development, as in other fields.
We can shout to the world that we are Better than the Paradise here on Borneo Island, but as one Sarawak tourism player puts it, who will come to this Paradise when there is no carrier to bring tourists here! How do they get here? From Sydney, Perth, Frankfurt? How many direct international routes have we left?
Gunong Mulu Resorts, the crown jewel of Sarawak Natural Heritage and tourism, was a couple of years back omitted by MTB publicity brochures featuring mountain resorts of Malaysia.
The tourism and related tourism services industry in Sarawak are just about up in arms. MAS and the Federal Ministry of Transport had always held their stranglehold on the rights to Sarawak airspace. Ironically, through years of mismanagement and top BN crony machinations, MAS is now totally eviscerated by another airline, the Air Asia; MAS has lost its stranglehold even over Sarawak airspace to that clever new–startup AA/FAX.
Make no mistake, as every other Malaysian, I feel the pride and affection of a Malaysian for our national carrier; however I am not the least amused by its present debacle.
Upon the honour of Sarawak and the people of Sarawak, if this State does not make its strongest stand to the Federal BN Government, MAS and especially smarter- than- thou Air Asia/FAX, aviation and tourism in Sarawak will be retreating decades backwards, what with her gleaming new airport terminals.
What is the State shareholding in Air Asia / FAX ? What is there to assure that Air Asia/ FAX will deliver a better service than MAS to the people and to the tourists arriving?
Our so–called “international” KIA and MIA face the unenviable prospect of
Reduced internal connectivity with major Malaysian towns and cities;
Virtually zero international direct connections;
In-coordination in ticketing, international and domestic flight connections, and baggage handling.
The way forward for Sarawak aviation, tourism and related service economy, as I see it, needs at least two major initiatives:
1. The greater opening of Sarawak airspace to other international carriers to access Kuching, Sibu and Miri, thus capitalizing on their more comprehensive presence in the international travel market, their vast networks and their more effective international marketing. The positive impact on Sarawak tourism, would be experienced within a short period of time.
2. In the longer term, the interests of Sarawak and the people of Sarawak may be better served by the establishment of a Sarawak Airlines, or a Sarawak-Sabah Airlines, where Sarawak and/or Sabah government and private stakeholders may have major and possibly controlling share ownership.
In the history of pioneering civil aviation in Borneo, in the 1950s and early 1960s, there existed SABAH AIRWAYS, then BORNEO AIRWAYS before the absorption into Malayan Airways, which evolved as Malaysian, MSA then MAS, as the then Sarawak Minister of Communications, none other than the Honorable YAB CM today can testify.
Brunei which opted to stay out of Malaysia, inaugurated Royal Brunei Airlines in 1975, with a creditable international network for a small nation with a total population less than that of Kuching. This indeed is the major gateway to Borneo which even East Malaysians use, at the expense of missed opportunities for our own economy!
In the best Malaysian spirit of optimism, Mr. Speaker, are we to be forever contented to see BRUNEI BOLEH, and practically everyone else BOLEH, but SARAWAK TAK BOLEH?! What then does this Government have to show for V2020? What to show for the Politics of Development, Mr. Speaker?
For your V2020 sake, talk to the Great Leader of the Kadazans, the Hon. Pairin Kitingan, whose proposals for Sabah Airlines was jettisoned by Dr. M , together with his PBS –led Government. Pairin, now in the politically-correct camp, would be happy that today we are striving for his once lost cause! Given Big-Brother blessing, I bet he would be more than willing to let his aviation dream for Sabah revived. Mr. Speaker, he at least had the foresight for Sabah interests, well ahead of us!
The initial mission of Sarawak Airlines must be to better serve the people of Sarawak and address the short-comings of the inter-current arrangements, both in the domestic rural and domestic East-Peninsular Malaysia sectors, Sarawak-Singapore sector. The wider mission must be the promotion of Sarawak interests in the region and the wider world.
The competitive advantage of Sarawak Airlines or SSA are more than one:
1. Major demand on the Singapore sector; popularity of Sarawak as a destination for Singaporeans;
2. The HK, China and Taiwan sector where there is fast growing potential for business travel and tourism both ways. Some large Chinese cities would be prime targets especially Guangzhou, Fuzhou, in addition to Shanghai and Beijing.
3. Major Australian destinations for Sarawak Students and their relatives provide a strong bottom-line seat occupancy several months in a year. The cities of Perth, Melbourne and Sydney should be prime initial targets. Every Sarawak student in Australia may be a potential promoter for Sarawak to augment the promotion already done by this Government –here my appreciation from this side of the House to Tourism Ministers concerned!
4. Sarawak and Sabah are strategically located in the ASEAN region; Thailand and Vietnam connections may have particular potential.
5. The legacy of the Sovereign State of Sarawak under the Brookes and of British Borneo provides the lure for some in the Western World. Routes to EU and N. America will however have to depend on good connections with Australasia and East and North-East Asia respectively.
Mr. Speaker, in the months ahead the people of Sarawak will be keenly watching the policy direction of this so-called Politics of Development Government in a matter as important as the lifeline to the people.
The people want to see real mettle of the State BN Government in persuading the Federal BN Government to truly respect Sarawak as a full partner of the Federation, a partner which will be proud to celebrate in the Golden Jubilee year, on Sept.16th 2013.
It is of utmost regret that the state has such little leverage in the development of aviation in Sarawak in the years that it is in the Federation. The cavaliar manner in which the State has been treated just because aviation is on the Federal list, cannot be anymore tolerated by the people of Sarawak; past, recent and intercurrent aviation events are all proving the point.
I hardly need to state the obvious that Sarawak is isolated not only by the South China Sea, but more so by the Federal BN Government leaving us in the backyard of aviation and tourism development, as in other fields.
We can shout to the world that we are Better than the Paradise here on Borneo Island, but as one Sarawak tourism player puts it, who will come to this Paradise when there is no carrier to bring tourists here! How do they get here? From Sydney, Perth, Frankfurt? How many direct international routes have we left?
Gunong Mulu Resorts, the crown jewel of Sarawak Natural Heritage and tourism, was a couple of years back omitted by MTB publicity brochures featuring mountain resorts of Malaysia.
The tourism and related tourism services industry in Sarawak are just about up in arms. MAS and the Federal Ministry of Transport had always held their stranglehold on the rights to Sarawak airspace. Ironically, through years of mismanagement and top BN crony machinations, MAS is now totally eviscerated by another airline, the Air Asia; MAS has lost its stranglehold even over Sarawak airspace to that clever new–startup AA/FAX.
Make no mistake, as every other Malaysian, I feel the pride and affection of a Malaysian for our national carrier; however I am not the least amused by its present debacle.
Upon the honour of Sarawak and the people of Sarawak, if this State does not make its strongest stand to the Federal BN Government, MAS and especially smarter- than- thou Air Asia/FAX, aviation and tourism in Sarawak will be retreating decades backwards, what with her gleaming new airport terminals.
What is the State shareholding in Air Asia / FAX ? What is there to assure that Air Asia/ FAX will deliver a better service than MAS to the people and to the tourists arriving?
Our so–called “international” KIA and MIA face the unenviable prospect of
Reduced internal connectivity with major Malaysian towns and cities;
Virtually zero international direct connections;
In-coordination in ticketing, international and domestic flight connections, and baggage handling.
The way forward for Sarawak aviation, tourism and related service economy, as I see it, needs at least two major initiatives:
1. The greater opening of Sarawak airspace to other international carriers to access Kuching, Sibu and Miri, thus capitalizing on their more comprehensive presence in the international travel market, their vast networks and their more effective international marketing. The positive impact on Sarawak tourism, would be experienced within a short period of time.
2. In the longer term, the interests of Sarawak and the people of Sarawak may be better served by the establishment of a Sarawak Airlines, or a Sarawak-Sabah Airlines, where Sarawak and/or Sabah government and private stakeholders may have major and possibly controlling share ownership.
In the history of pioneering civil aviation in Borneo, in the 1950s and early 1960s, there existed SABAH AIRWAYS, then BORNEO AIRWAYS before the absorption into Malayan Airways, which evolved as Malaysian, MSA then MAS, as the then Sarawak Minister of Communications, none other than the Honorable YAB CM today can testify.
Brunei which opted to stay out of Malaysia, inaugurated Royal Brunei Airlines in 1975, with a creditable international network for a small nation with a total population less than that of Kuching. This indeed is the major gateway to Borneo which even East Malaysians use, at the expense of missed opportunities for our own economy!
In the best Malaysian spirit of optimism, Mr. Speaker, are we to be forever contented to see BRUNEI BOLEH, and practically everyone else BOLEH, but SARAWAK TAK BOLEH?! What then does this Government have to show for V2020? What to show for the Politics of Development, Mr. Speaker?
For your V2020 sake, talk to the Great Leader of the Kadazans, the Hon. Pairin Kitingan, whose proposals for Sabah Airlines was jettisoned by Dr. M , together with his PBS –led Government. Pairin, now in the politically-correct camp, would be happy that today we are striving for his once lost cause! Given Big-Brother blessing, I bet he would be more than willing to let his aviation dream for Sabah revived. Mr. Speaker, he at least had the foresight for Sabah interests, well ahead of us!
The initial mission of Sarawak Airlines must be to better serve the people of Sarawak and address the short-comings of the inter-current arrangements, both in the domestic rural and domestic East-Peninsular Malaysia sectors, Sarawak-Singapore sector. The wider mission must be the promotion of Sarawak interests in the region and the wider world.
The competitive advantage of Sarawak Airlines or SSA are more than one:
1. Major demand on the Singapore sector; popularity of Sarawak as a destination for Singaporeans;
2. The HK, China and Taiwan sector where there is fast growing potential for business travel and tourism both ways. Some large Chinese cities would be prime targets especially Guangzhou, Fuzhou, in addition to Shanghai and Beijing.
3. Major Australian destinations for Sarawak Students and their relatives provide a strong bottom-line seat occupancy several months in a year. The cities of Perth, Melbourne and Sydney should be prime initial targets. Every Sarawak student in Australia may be a potential promoter for Sarawak to augment the promotion already done by this Government –here my appreciation from this side of the House to Tourism Ministers concerned!
4. Sarawak and Sabah are strategically located in the ASEAN region; Thailand and Vietnam connections may have particular potential.
5. The legacy of the Sovereign State of Sarawak under the Brookes and of British Borneo provides the lure for some in the Western World. Routes to EU and N. America will however have to depend on good connections with Australasia and East and North-East Asia respectively.
Mr. Speaker, in the months ahead the people of Sarawak will be keenly watching the policy direction of this so-called Politics of Development Government in a matter as important as the lifeline to the people.
The people want to see real mettle of the State BN Government in persuading the Federal BN Government to truly respect Sarawak as a full partner of the Federation, a partner which will be proud to celebrate in the Golden Jubilee year, on Sept.16th 2013.
VII. Call To Stop The Excessive Number of Draws By 4-Digit Companies
VII. Call To Stop The Excessive Number of Draws By 4-Digit Companies
There are four (4) such companies, namely Magnum 4D, Big 4 Cash Sweep, Toto and Damacai.
Each company currently conducts three (3) draws per week, thus giving a total frequency of 12 draws a week or almost 50 regular draws. With a special draw thrown in by each company each month, there are some 54 draws in Sarawak per month.
This situation is most absurd, and leads to an excess culture of gambling. The draws drains crucial funds meant for essential family up-keep expenditure and reduces consumer spending in the broader retail and services economy. And the poorer the family, the more they are likely to be the punters.
The State Government has also imposed a 10% supplementary tax on 4D tickets, making each ticket costing RM1.10. This is a classic example of the very unfair situation of a double taxation.
Based on the numerous and ceaseless public appeals received by Parti KeAdilan Rakyat, I propose:
(1) 4D regular draws be limited to 1 draw per week by each company;
(2) Special 4D draws be totally stopped; and
(3) The 10% State Government Tax be abolished.
There are four (4) such companies, namely Magnum 4D, Big 4 Cash Sweep, Toto and Damacai.
Each company currently conducts three (3) draws per week, thus giving a total frequency of 12 draws a week or almost 50 regular draws. With a special draw thrown in by each company each month, there are some 54 draws in Sarawak per month.
This situation is most absurd, and leads to an excess culture of gambling. The draws drains crucial funds meant for essential family up-keep expenditure and reduces consumer spending in the broader retail and services economy. And the poorer the family, the more they are likely to be the punters.
The State Government has also imposed a 10% supplementary tax on 4D tickets, making each ticket costing RM1.10. This is a classic example of the very unfair situation of a double taxation.
Based on the numerous and ceaseless public appeals received by Parti KeAdilan Rakyat, I propose:
(1) 4D regular draws be limited to 1 draw per week by each company;
(2) Special 4D draws be totally stopped; and
(3) The 10% State Government Tax be abolished.
VI. SPECIAL ANNUAL GRANTS FOR CHINESE INDEPENDENT SECONDARY SCHOOLS, AIDED CHINESE PRIMARY SCHOOLS AND AIDED MISSION SCHOOLS.
VI. SPECIAL ANNUAL GRANTS FOR CHINESE INDEPENDENT SECONDARY SCHOOLS, AIDED CHINESE PRIMARY SCHOOLS AND AIDED MISSION SCHOOLS.
Sarawakians well versed in the Chinese language provide the state with a major competitive advantage in the globalised world of today. This fact is recognized not only by the ethnic Chinese, but by many other Sarawakians as well. Chinese secondary education is also the key to the preservation of Chinese culture, and the importance of the Chinese language to all Malaysians is now nationally recognized.
In recent years, the 14 Chinese Independent Secondary Schools in Sarawak have seen steady annual rises in enrollment in Sarawak; from 4,564 to 5,099 in 2006, testifying to widespread community demand. Nationally, some 50,000 are enrolled at 60 non-profit Chinese Independent Secondary Schools. The Chinese Independent Secondary Schools try their very best to comply with curricular standards laid down by the Ministry of Education. BM, and English are compulsory subjects.
In the last 30 years or so, of the some 150,000 students who completed schooling with Chinese Independent Secondary Schools , many have gone on to tertiary education locally and overseas, or become entrepreneurs. They have made significant contributions to national progress in all fields of political, social and economic life. Government should thus accord recognition and encourage community initiatives in organizing quality education to complement the fully National type schools. It is time the Federal and State Governments both step in to share the burden that has fallen so heavily on the Chinese community.
Aided Chinese Primary Schools
While the Federal Government provides limited funding for Aided Chinese Primary Schools, the State Government could well give further financial assistance to the Aided Chinese Primary Schools in areas such as buildings and material, maintenance, IT and sports facilities.
The Aided Chinese Primary Schools are facing the prospect of increased demand in enrollment from all communities, and this I consider a good thing. There is indeed an urgent need for new Aided Chinese Primary Schools building projects to decongest class-rooms bursting with 60 or more students. However, since the establishment of Chung Hua Primary No. 6 in Kuching, there has not been an increase of Aided Chinese Primary Schools.
Chinese Independent Secondary Schools
It is the faithful individuals and associations in the Chinese community, who toil to raise funds for the 14 Chinese independent secondary schools in the State. Yet the Chinese Independent Secondary Schools still face a collective budget deficit of some RM 5 million a year. So the so called initiative that the SUPP announced a couple of days ago that they will come up with RM500,000 a year is far too little and too late. RM 500,000 is not enough.
Mr. Speaker, for the sake of the continued survival and progress of Chinese Independent Secondary Schools, public sector funding, and not the dependence on charity, must be the only way forward.
And ample precedence throughout Malaysia exists for State Governments providing funds for Chinese Independent Secondary Schools:
States with BN State Governments making annual grants or have alienated land to Chinese Independent Secondary Schools include Penang, Selangor, Perak and Kedah;
The Malacca BN Government grants scholarships annually for the students from poor financial backgrounds attending Chinese Independent Secondary Schools.
In Sabah the PBS, then BN Government has been making annual grants for the 9 Chinese Independent Secondary Schools since 1991.
SABAH BOLEH, SARAWAK TAK BOLEH!
The Kelantan PAS Government is even more dedicated to the principle of mother tongue education by solving the funding problem once and for all. It generously donated 1000 acres of land for agricultural development to Chinese School association, proceeds from which will see Chinese education go a long way. And this for a Government which others in this House enjoy vilifying, so often and so wrongly.
KELANTAN BOLEH, SARAWAK TAK BOLEH!
Does Sarawak not have a greater percentage of ethnic Chinese, than Kelantan and Sabah?
Does the Sarawak BN Government not have a stronger Chinese political partner than the Chinese partnership in the Kelantan PAS Government?
Why then if Kelantan can, Sarawak cannot deliver for Chinese education?
Aided Missionary Schools
If one has the opportunity to travel widely in Sarawak, one would be able to see many a Missionary schools; they are in almost every corner in Sarawak. This is a result of the selfless sacrifice of the Christian missionaries, be they Catholic or Protestant. They have diligently taught and brought up entire generations of well educated and rounded students and who are now leaders of today.
I am one such proud product, of no less a school than that of St Joseph’s Kuching. Indeed I dare say that half the present cabinet and most of the previous cabinets are products of such schools, from the CM down.
Yet despite all their contributions and having all the people in the highest of places, the need for sufficient funding continues to haunt practically every one of them.
Two years ago, SMB St Teresa raised an amazing sum of RM450,000. This was the largest ever raised in any fund raising event it had undertaken. That came about because there was a donation of RM250,000 from the State government. However that kind of magnanimity came but once in a blue moon. And despite that the school still lacks in several key areas. They could only renovate parts of the assembly hall, buy some furniture to replace broken ones and etc, but the school is still desperately in need of funds for many other smaller and much needed projects.
The PTAs and esp the teachers of such schools spend a significant amount of their efforts on raising money. Sometimes the fund raising is throughout the year! Surely this is no way for schools to be run, taking precious resources away from the education of the children which should be foremost on the agenda of any school!
The only solution is again public funding and annually too, and its time that the state government take up its responsibility to ensure that the education of our children in such schools be not compromised.
Sarawakians well versed in the Chinese language provide the state with a major competitive advantage in the globalised world of today. This fact is recognized not only by the ethnic Chinese, but by many other Sarawakians as well. Chinese secondary education is also the key to the preservation of Chinese culture, and the importance of the Chinese language to all Malaysians is now nationally recognized.
In recent years, the 14 Chinese Independent Secondary Schools in Sarawak have seen steady annual rises in enrollment in Sarawak; from 4,564 to 5,099 in 2006, testifying to widespread community demand. Nationally, some 50,000 are enrolled at 60 non-profit Chinese Independent Secondary Schools. The Chinese Independent Secondary Schools try their very best to comply with curricular standards laid down by the Ministry of Education. BM, and English are compulsory subjects.
In the last 30 years or so, of the some 150,000 students who completed schooling with Chinese Independent Secondary Schools , many have gone on to tertiary education locally and overseas, or become entrepreneurs. They have made significant contributions to national progress in all fields of political, social and economic life. Government should thus accord recognition and encourage community initiatives in organizing quality education to complement the fully National type schools. It is time the Federal and State Governments both step in to share the burden that has fallen so heavily on the Chinese community.
Aided Chinese Primary Schools
While the Federal Government provides limited funding for Aided Chinese Primary Schools, the State Government could well give further financial assistance to the Aided Chinese Primary Schools in areas such as buildings and material, maintenance, IT and sports facilities.
The Aided Chinese Primary Schools are facing the prospect of increased demand in enrollment from all communities, and this I consider a good thing. There is indeed an urgent need for new Aided Chinese Primary Schools building projects to decongest class-rooms bursting with 60 or more students. However, since the establishment of Chung Hua Primary No. 6 in Kuching, there has not been an increase of Aided Chinese Primary Schools.
Chinese Independent Secondary Schools
It is the faithful individuals and associations in the Chinese community, who toil to raise funds for the 14 Chinese independent secondary schools in the State. Yet the Chinese Independent Secondary Schools still face a collective budget deficit of some RM 5 million a year. So the so called initiative that the SUPP announced a couple of days ago that they will come up with RM500,000 a year is far too little and too late. RM 500,000 is not enough.
Mr. Speaker, for the sake of the continued survival and progress of Chinese Independent Secondary Schools, public sector funding, and not the dependence on charity, must be the only way forward.
And ample precedence throughout Malaysia exists for State Governments providing funds for Chinese Independent Secondary Schools:
States with BN State Governments making annual grants or have alienated land to Chinese Independent Secondary Schools include Penang, Selangor, Perak and Kedah;
The Malacca BN Government grants scholarships annually for the students from poor financial backgrounds attending Chinese Independent Secondary Schools.
In Sabah the PBS, then BN Government has been making annual grants for the 9 Chinese Independent Secondary Schools since 1991.
SABAH BOLEH, SARAWAK TAK BOLEH!
The Kelantan PAS Government is even more dedicated to the principle of mother tongue education by solving the funding problem once and for all. It generously donated 1000 acres of land for agricultural development to Chinese School association, proceeds from which will see Chinese education go a long way. And this for a Government which others in this House enjoy vilifying, so often and so wrongly.
KELANTAN BOLEH, SARAWAK TAK BOLEH!
Does Sarawak not have a greater percentage of ethnic Chinese, than Kelantan and Sabah?
Does the Sarawak BN Government not have a stronger Chinese political partner than the Chinese partnership in the Kelantan PAS Government?
Why then if Kelantan can, Sarawak cannot deliver for Chinese education?
Aided Missionary Schools
If one has the opportunity to travel widely in Sarawak, one would be able to see many a Missionary schools; they are in almost every corner in Sarawak. This is a result of the selfless sacrifice of the Christian missionaries, be they Catholic or Protestant. They have diligently taught and brought up entire generations of well educated and rounded students and who are now leaders of today.
I am one such proud product, of no less a school than that of St Joseph’s Kuching. Indeed I dare say that half the present cabinet and most of the previous cabinets are products of such schools, from the CM down.
Yet despite all their contributions and having all the people in the highest of places, the need for sufficient funding continues to haunt practically every one of them.
Two years ago, SMB St Teresa raised an amazing sum of RM450,000. This was the largest ever raised in any fund raising event it had undertaken. That came about because there was a donation of RM250,000 from the State government. However that kind of magnanimity came but once in a blue moon. And despite that the school still lacks in several key areas. They could only renovate parts of the assembly hall, buy some furniture to replace broken ones and etc, but the school is still desperately in need of funds for many other smaller and much needed projects.
The PTAs and esp the teachers of such schools spend a significant amount of their efforts on raising money. Sometimes the fund raising is throughout the year! Surely this is no way for schools to be run, taking precious resources away from the education of the children which should be foremost on the agenda of any school!
The only solution is again public funding and annually too, and its time that the state government take up its responsibility to ensure that the education of our children in such schools be not compromised.
5.) V. A Proposal for an Old Age Monthly Allowance
V. A Proposal for an Old Age Monthly Allowance
With the RM 2 billion a year, we can also contemplate social welfare for our poor and elderly.
The average person works from about 18 years till about 60 years of age, each in his/her own way toiling and contributing to our community, state and nation. By their 7th decade, many would have been weakened by sickness or infirmity and would not be able to further apply themselves to gainful work. Thus, it is societal responsibility, it is Government responsibility to repay and look after them in their twilight years.
The young parents of today face formidable pressure in providing for the upkeep of their own nuclear family, what with the ever rising cost of living. They find themselves in severe hardship, if they have aged parents to support, especially should they e infirm or need more medical care as they age. The young and the aged both need a break!
I would like to call upon the Government to consider for Senior Citizens aged 60 years and above, a Monthly Welfare Allowance of RM200.
There are currently some 160,000 Sarawakians who are 60 years and above. A breakdown of figures according to the Sarawak Year Book of Statistics for 2004 is as follows:
Age range Number
60-64 53,800
65-69 39,100
70-74 26,800
75+ 34,300
Total 154,000
If we are to give RM200 per month to each and every 60 year old in Sarawak, it will only incur an expenditure of some RM384 million a year. This is a figure which is only about half the amount we are wasting through the 1st Silicon annually!
A caring society, true to description, should incorporate such concept of care under an institutionalized framework. In an Asian society traditionally respectful of elders, an obligation of an elected Government is surely the support, care and protection of the older citizens. Such concept of societal concern and care must not be left to the limited resources of charitable individuals, organisations or religious linked groups, though their contribution is praiseworthy, edifying and to be encouraged.
A start has to be made, and made right now, if the Government is to establish its position as the fountain of care and concern of the people. Such must also necessarily be the precondition for a government to remain relevant for it to be fit to govern; for it to be creditable in promoting desired societal culture such as caring society.
It is fitting that, a start to be made with the aging and aged citizens as our flag-bearing social sector initiative, to be expanded in scope and greater comprehensiveness as we go along.
With the RM 2 billion a year, we can also contemplate social welfare for our poor and elderly.
The average person works from about 18 years till about 60 years of age, each in his/her own way toiling and contributing to our community, state and nation. By their 7th decade, many would have been weakened by sickness or infirmity and would not be able to further apply themselves to gainful work. Thus, it is societal responsibility, it is Government responsibility to repay and look after them in their twilight years.
The young parents of today face formidable pressure in providing for the upkeep of their own nuclear family, what with the ever rising cost of living. They find themselves in severe hardship, if they have aged parents to support, especially should they e infirm or need more medical care as they age. The young and the aged both need a break!
I would like to call upon the Government to consider for Senior Citizens aged 60 years and above, a Monthly Welfare Allowance of RM200.
There are currently some 160,000 Sarawakians who are 60 years and above. A breakdown of figures according to the Sarawak Year Book of Statistics for 2004 is as follows:
Age range Number
60-64 53,800
65-69 39,100
70-74 26,800
75+ 34,300
Total 154,000
If we are to give RM200 per month to each and every 60 year old in Sarawak, it will only incur an expenditure of some RM384 million a year. This is a figure which is only about half the amount we are wasting through the 1st Silicon annually!
A caring society, true to description, should incorporate such concept of care under an institutionalized framework. In an Asian society traditionally respectful of elders, an obligation of an elected Government is surely the support, care and protection of the older citizens. Such concept of societal concern and care must not be left to the limited resources of charitable individuals, organisations or religious linked groups, though their contribution is praiseworthy, edifying and to be encouraged.
A start has to be made, and made right now, if the Government is to establish its position as the fountain of care and concern of the people. Such must also necessarily be the precondition for a government to remain relevant for it to be fit to govern; for it to be creditable in promoting desired societal culture such as caring society.
It is fitting that, a start to be made with the aging and aged citizens as our flag-bearing social sector initiative, to be expanded in scope and greater comprehensiveness as we go along.
4.) IV. TIME for STATE CONTROL OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCES
IV. TIME for STATE CONTROL OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCES
Mr. Speaker, the concept of a federation of partners is for resources and wealth to be shared. It can only be on the basis of equitable sharing that a Federation can grow and progress in a dignified and meaningful manner for all the partners.
For several decades now Sarawak, along with Sabah and Terengganu, the states endowed with enormous oil and gas resources, has over-accommodated herself to the well being of the Federation. The average daily output from Sarawak fields amounts to some 128,600 barrels of crude, and 2.94 billion cu. ft. of LNG. For the decades past, the Federal BN Government has arrogated to itself our state’s vast oil wealth! To the detriment of the peoples of Sarawak, there has been no equitable sharing. The tragic proof is the acknowledged development gap between East and Peninsular Malaysia.
The massive resources were signed over to the federation by the State government, so that it may be better managed by the national corporation, PETRONAS. Over the last 20 years or so, Sarawak received just 5% of the national oil and gas revenue.
Mr. Speaker, the Federal Government, through PETRONAS, has utterly failed in responsible stewardship of our invaluable resources. Deliberate policy aberrations, especially using PETRONAS repeatedly to bail out other failed corporations, are in violation of the trust Sarawak vested on the Barisan Nasional controlled Federal Government. The State Barisan Nasional Government has all along stood in silent consent and in blatant dereliction of their mandate to oversee and safeguard the judicious use of our oil and gas wealth.
PETRONAS has gained massively from the rise in world oil prices as Malaysia is a nett oil exporter; so should have the Government revenues jumped. In the financial year to 31st Mar. 2006, Petronas raked in over RM 70.2 billion in pre-tax profit, a 21% increase over the RM 58 billion of the previous period. After- tax profit amounted to RM 43.6 billion, an increase of 22% over the RM 35.6 billion of the previous period.
The Case for Increasing the Royalty from 5% to 20%
Currently distribution of the gross value of the petroleum as prescribed by the Petroleum Development Act is as follows:
Government of Producing State 5% royalty on gross value of output
Federal Government 5% royalty on gross value of output
Producer company 20% for cost recovery
Total 30%
Producer company 21% (30% of remaining 70%)
PETRONAS 49% (70% of remaining 70%)
100%
The question that begs to be asked is why should we continue to give PETRONAS 49% when it has done nothing for us? Shouldn’t it be us who should be given the 49%?
The issue of increasing the petroleum royalties of the producing states has often been raised. For instance, during the election campaign of October 1990, the CM of Sabah argued that the rate of petroleum royalty to the state should be increased from 5% to 50%!. As for Sarawak, in 1969, the then CM claimed that the Federal Government has orally assured Sarawak that we could have all the revenue from off-shore petroleum in return a lower federal grant. Since most of the petroleum in Sarawak is found off shore, if all revenue accrued to the state government, its revenue would be boosted tremendously! Based on the principle of ownership of the continental shelf by adjoining regions, Sabah and Sarawak could claim ownership before the incorporation of Malaysia in 1963. The status quo could have been maintained insofar as the Malaysian Constitution is silent on the matter. Thus the claim to its ownership by the Federal Government may be construed as an annexation! (See Sabah and Sarawak in the Malaysian Economy by Wee Chong Hui, 1995).
There is a clear breach of the Malaysia Agreement where the consent and agreement of Sarawak was not obtained. The Sarawak Government should consider taking up the case, legally if necessary to get back Sarawak’s rights over our oil resources.
So the claim for just 20% would be considered quite low and therefore reasonable.
According to the Speech of the Hon YAB CM for the Supply Bill (06) 05, the state government has been paid a total of RM1.1671 billion for the year 2005 for its 5% royalty. It is expected that from 2006 onwards we shall get at least RM1.2 billion a year in royalties. If we are able to raise the royalty payment to 20% then it would result in a massive RM4.8 billion, or a surplus of RM2.2 billion after we deduct the Annual Budget which is currently costing us for the current year a total of RM2.645 billion.
What can we do with RM2 billion a year you might say!!!
But first before we think about spending the RM2 billion, we can already do away with the 10% tax for 4D, which took from us a sum of RM80 million, do away with the 5% State Sales Tax which cut into us a sum of RM163 million and we can also do without land premiums which is netting the government a sum of about RM180 million annually! Sarawakians will for the first time really enjoy the fruits of Sarawak! With the lifting of such taxes. And on a short calculation, the 80 million plus 163 million plus 180 million which now we are taking from the people of Sarawak, if we want to give it back to the people of Sarawak will save every Sarawakian an average of RM192 a year.
And with the RM 2 billion a year, we can subsidise petrol prices at the pump and keep it to the pre 2000 figures or before the latest round of price increases! With the RM2 billion a year, we can contemplate improving our really atrocious public transport system in Sarawak.
We can even contemplate a rail and light rail transport in Sarawak, beginning in the densely populated Kuching, Padawan, Serian region. Or, more cheaply, in a Rapid Transit Bus Network system, currently introduced with great success in some foreign cities.
A safer double lane international grade highway from Lundu to northern Sarawak, with double lane feeders into larger towns, can be planned and be built in the next 10 years!
I therefore call for A TOTAL REVIEW OF OUR OIL, GAS AND ENERGY POLICY!
And I urge the Sarawak Government that is now across the floor, to hear this plea of Sarawakians. Please stand up for Sarawakians. Please fight for our rights!
The State BN Government must put it to the Federal BN Government to set an immediate timetable for the either the return of Oil & Gas Resources to Sarawak, or to give us 20% in royalty. When there is a political will there is a political way!
Mr. Speaker, the concept of a federation of partners is for resources and wealth to be shared. It can only be on the basis of equitable sharing that a Federation can grow and progress in a dignified and meaningful manner for all the partners.
For several decades now Sarawak, along with Sabah and Terengganu, the states endowed with enormous oil and gas resources, has over-accommodated herself to the well being of the Federation. The average daily output from Sarawak fields amounts to some 128,600 barrels of crude, and 2.94 billion cu. ft. of LNG. For the decades past, the Federal BN Government has arrogated to itself our state’s vast oil wealth! To the detriment of the peoples of Sarawak, there has been no equitable sharing. The tragic proof is the acknowledged development gap between East and Peninsular Malaysia.
The massive resources were signed over to the federation by the State government, so that it may be better managed by the national corporation, PETRONAS. Over the last 20 years or so, Sarawak received just 5% of the national oil and gas revenue.
Mr. Speaker, the Federal Government, through PETRONAS, has utterly failed in responsible stewardship of our invaluable resources. Deliberate policy aberrations, especially using PETRONAS repeatedly to bail out other failed corporations, are in violation of the trust Sarawak vested on the Barisan Nasional controlled Federal Government. The State Barisan Nasional Government has all along stood in silent consent and in blatant dereliction of their mandate to oversee and safeguard the judicious use of our oil and gas wealth.
PETRONAS has gained massively from the rise in world oil prices as Malaysia is a nett oil exporter; so should have the Government revenues jumped. In the financial year to 31st Mar. 2006, Petronas raked in over RM 70.2 billion in pre-tax profit, a 21% increase over the RM 58 billion of the previous period. After- tax profit amounted to RM 43.6 billion, an increase of 22% over the RM 35.6 billion of the previous period.
The Case for Increasing the Royalty from 5% to 20%
Currently distribution of the gross value of the petroleum as prescribed by the Petroleum Development Act is as follows:
Government of Producing State 5% royalty on gross value of output
Federal Government 5% royalty on gross value of output
Producer company 20% for cost recovery
Total 30%
Producer company 21% (30% of remaining 70%)
PETRONAS 49% (70% of remaining 70%)
100%
The question that begs to be asked is why should we continue to give PETRONAS 49% when it has done nothing for us? Shouldn’t it be us who should be given the 49%?
The issue of increasing the petroleum royalties of the producing states has often been raised. For instance, during the election campaign of October 1990, the CM of Sabah argued that the rate of petroleum royalty to the state should be increased from 5% to 50%!. As for Sarawak, in 1969, the then CM claimed that the Federal Government has orally assured Sarawak that we could have all the revenue from off-shore petroleum in return a lower federal grant. Since most of the petroleum in Sarawak is found off shore, if all revenue accrued to the state government, its revenue would be boosted tremendously! Based on the principle of ownership of the continental shelf by adjoining regions, Sabah and Sarawak could claim ownership before the incorporation of Malaysia in 1963. The status quo could have been maintained insofar as the Malaysian Constitution is silent on the matter. Thus the claim to its ownership by the Federal Government may be construed as an annexation! (See Sabah and Sarawak in the Malaysian Economy by Wee Chong Hui, 1995).
There is a clear breach of the Malaysia Agreement where the consent and agreement of Sarawak was not obtained. The Sarawak Government should consider taking up the case, legally if necessary to get back Sarawak’s rights over our oil resources.
So the claim for just 20% would be considered quite low and therefore reasonable.
According to the Speech of the Hon YAB CM for the Supply Bill (06) 05, the state government has been paid a total of RM1.1671 billion for the year 2005 for its 5% royalty. It is expected that from 2006 onwards we shall get at least RM1.2 billion a year in royalties. If we are able to raise the royalty payment to 20% then it would result in a massive RM4.8 billion, or a surplus of RM2.2 billion after we deduct the Annual Budget which is currently costing us for the current year a total of RM2.645 billion.
What can we do with RM2 billion a year you might say!!!
But first before we think about spending the RM2 billion, we can already do away with the 10% tax for 4D, which took from us a sum of RM80 million, do away with the 5% State Sales Tax which cut into us a sum of RM163 million and we can also do without land premiums which is netting the government a sum of about RM180 million annually! Sarawakians will for the first time really enjoy the fruits of Sarawak! With the lifting of such taxes. And on a short calculation, the 80 million plus 163 million plus 180 million which now we are taking from the people of Sarawak, if we want to give it back to the people of Sarawak will save every Sarawakian an average of RM192 a year.
And with the RM 2 billion a year, we can subsidise petrol prices at the pump and keep it to the pre 2000 figures or before the latest round of price increases! With the RM2 billion a year, we can contemplate improving our really atrocious public transport system in Sarawak.
We can even contemplate a rail and light rail transport in Sarawak, beginning in the densely populated Kuching, Padawan, Serian region. Or, more cheaply, in a Rapid Transit Bus Network system, currently introduced with great success in some foreign cities.
A safer double lane international grade highway from Lundu to northern Sarawak, with double lane feeders into larger towns, can be planned and be built in the next 10 years!
I therefore call for A TOTAL REVIEW OF OUR OIL, GAS AND ENERGY POLICY!
And I urge the Sarawak Government that is now across the floor, to hear this plea of Sarawakians. Please stand up for Sarawakians. Please fight for our rights!
The State BN Government must put it to the Federal BN Government to set an immediate timetable for the either the return of Oil & Gas Resources to Sarawak, or to give us 20% in royalty. When there is a political will there is a political way!
3.) III. LAND
III. LAND
I now go on to the next most important area of my speech, that of Land. Again the BBS have a policy which calls for nothing short of a revolution of the Concept of Land in Sarawak!
10-POINT LAND POLICY OF THE BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK
THE RETURN OF LAND TO SARAWAKIANS
Preamble: We the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (BBS) acknowledges and recognises that all lands in Sarawak belong to the people and that the government only holds the land in trust for the people. In this respect if elected, a BBS government will put as its top priority the passing of the relevant laws that will return all lands to the people of Sarawak
1. The term “state land” ought to be changed to “people’s land” or “tanah rakyat”. This will reflect the original and traditional status of land in Sarawak, which is that land belongs to the people and not to the government, except for “waste or unoccupied lands”.
2. Land ought to be made available to all landless and needy Sarawakian families. NO Sarawak families should become squatters in their own land.
3. All residential lands should be issued with grants in perpetuity and other categories of lands, for 999 years. All lands currently held with 60 or 99 year lease periods should be automatically converted to lands with such leases, with no further payment of premiums except for a nominal administrative charge.
4. We are totally opposed to the BN government’s imposition of high premiums on the renewal of leases, with a minimum of 25% (for agricultural lands), to 60% (for residential lands) and up to 75% (for commercial lands), of the current market value. A BBS government will abolish such premiums.
5. All NCR lands must be surveyed and proper titles issued to the rightful owners. NCR must be accorded with full and complete recognition under the Sarawak Constitution and such other Laws like the Sarawak Land Code.
6. A Native Customary Rights Land Commission should be set up to identify, determine and settle all NCR lands issues and it should be vested with powers to issue full titles to the NCR land owners.
7. The BBS undertakes to have a complete review of the Sarawak Land Code, with firm objectives of removing all “anti people” and unjust provisions that are designed to confer arbitrary powers on authorities like the State Planning Authority, which has now the power to take away land from the people and give it to those who are well connected with the government of the day.
8. There ought to be a Land Acquisition Ordinance in Sarawak in order to regularise and to ensure that Land Acquisition in Sarawak will be properly carried. The current practice of a declaration under section 48 (of the Sarawak Land Code) which is of the government’s intention to resume land, imposes hardship and causes blatant injustice to the land owner as there is no time limit. As such no such declaration should be allowed to be valid for more than 2 years.
9. Land of any category of holdings may and should only be acquired for truly public purposes (and not at the whims and fancy of any person) and be properly and fairly compensated by the government. No persons may be deprived of their lands without fair compensation. This is a constitutionally guaranteed right.
10. No land should be acquired without the affected land owner having been given the opportunity to be heard first, and the government must be required to justify its acquisition.
I now go on to the next most important area of my speech, that of Land. Again the BBS have a policy which calls for nothing short of a revolution of the Concept of Land in Sarawak!
10-POINT LAND POLICY OF THE BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK
THE RETURN OF LAND TO SARAWAKIANS
Preamble: We the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (BBS) acknowledges and recognises that all lands in Sarawak belong to the people and that the government only holds the land in trust for the people. In this respect if elected, a BBS government will put as its top priority the passing of the relevant laws that will return all lands to the people of Sarawak
1. The term “state land” ought to be changed to “people’s land” or “tanah rakyat”. This will reflect the original and traditional status of land in Sarawak, which is that land belongs to the people and not to the government, except for “waste or unoccupied lands”.
2. Land ought to be made available to all landless and needy Sarawakian families. NO Sarawak families should become squatters in their own land.
3. All residential lands should be issued with grants in perpetuity and other categories of lands, for 999 years. All lands currently held with 60 or 99 year lease periods should be automatically converted to lands with such leases, with no further payment of premiums except for a nominal administrative charge.
4. We are totally opposed to the BN government’s imposition of high premiums on the renewal of leases, with a minimum of 25% (for agricultural lands), to 60% (for residential lands) and up to 75% (for commercial lands), of the current market value. A BBS government will abolish such premiums.
5. All NCR lands must be surveyed and proper titles issued to the rightful owners. NCR must be accorded with full and complete recognition under the Sarawak Constitution and such other Laws like the Sarawak Land Code.
6. A Native Customary Rights Land Commission should be set up to identify, determine and settle all NCR lands issues and it should be vested with powers to issue full titles to the NCR land owners.
7. The BBS undertakes to have a complete review of the Sarawak Land Code, with firm objectives of removing all “anti people” and unjust provisions that are designed to confer arbitrary powers on authorities like the State Planning Authority, which has now the power to take away land from the people and give it to those who are well connected with the government of the day.
8. There ought to be a Land Acquisition Ordinance in Sarawak in order to regularise and to ensure that Land Acquisition in Sarawak will be properly carried. The current practice of a declaration under section 48 (of the Sarawak Land Code) which is of the government’s intention to resume land, imposes hardship and causes blatant injustice to the land owner as there is no time limit. As such no such declaration should be allowed to be valid for more than 2 years.
9. Land of any category of holdings may and should only be acquired for truly public purposes (and not at the whims and fancy of any person) and be properly and fairly compensated by the government. No persons may be deprived of their lands without fair compensation. This is a constitutionally guaranteed right.
10. No land should be acquired without the affected land owner having been given the opportunity to be heard first, and the government must be required to justify its acquisition.
2.) II. BBS DECLARATION AND MANIFESTO
II. BBS DECLARATION AND MANIFESTO
As the flag bearer and the representative of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak in this August House, I would like to take this opportunity to proclaim for the solemn and permanent records of this August House the Declaration and the Manifesto of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (as a foot note I would like also to inform this August House that I am one of the proud authors of both the said documents):
THE BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK DECLARATION
Whereas according to the Nine Cardinal Principles as bequeathed by the Rajahs, and which have been honoured by the British Colonial Government*, Sarawak is the Heritage of all Sarawakians and is only held in trust by the Government of the Day for them,
Whereas despite the fact that we have been independent and self governing for 40 over years, Sarawakians have increasingly been denied and deprived of the rights that have been granted to them by the previous governments of Sarawak,
We the undersigned parties representing our respective parties do hereby solemnly and sincerely declare and do pledge that:
We as loyal and patriotic Sarawakians have come together in common cause and to struggle for our beloved state of Sarawak
We will struggle to restore and to return all the rights and privileges that rightly belong to all Sarawakians, and which have been progressively taken away by the Barisan National government
We will not detract or stray from our noble cause no matter what, and until our objectives we have set for Sarawak have been achieved
Towards this objective we have formed the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (BBS) and will in due course register and contest under a common logo and common manifesto
To ensure the success of our set objectives, we shall work with all like minded parties and individuals who share our objectives
We shall work under a sharing and collective leadership which will ensure that no races or regions in Sarawak will ever be neglected or forgotten again.
Dated this 6th day of May 2006
(signed) (signed) (signed)
------------------------------ -------------------------------- ---------------------------
Hj Wan Zainal Abidin Edwin Dundang ak Bugak Nicholas Bawing ak
Bin Wan Senusi Anggat
Chairman, Liaison Committee, President, Protem President,
Parti KeADILan Rakyat Sarawak National Party Malaysian Dayak Congress
*According to Tan Sri Datuk Ong Kee Hui in the first volume of his Memoirs “Footprints in Sarawak”, the Nine Cardinal Principles were embodied in the 1941 Constitution of Sarawak and Accepted by the British Government in 1946.
MANIFESTO OF BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK
Barisan Bersatu Sarawak consists of 3 component Parties: Sarawak National Party, Parti KeAdilan Rakyat and Malaysian Dayak Congress, and is open to and embraces All Sarawakians committed to bringing about changes to the political environment in Sarawak.
1. THE MISSION OF BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK
1.1 To build a New Sarawak that will be one for all Sarawakians, and allow them to assume their rightful and proud position in the Malaysian entity.
1.2 To ensure justice, freedom and equality of treatment, fair distribution of wealth and equal opportunity for all Sarawakians irrespective of race, culture, creed or religion.
2. SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT
2.1 To establish a clean, fair, truly democratic and transparent government and one devoid of corruption, nepotism and abuse of power.
2.2 To restructure the State Civil Service with the objective of ensuring optimum transparency and accountability in the running of the State Administration.
2.3 To implement a ruling limiting the tenure of office of the Chief Minister to a period not exceeding 10 years as part of the strategy to prevent corruption and abuse of power by anyone entrusted to serve in that capacity.
3. LAND
3.1 We, the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (BBS) acknowledge and recognise that all lands in Sarawak belong to the people and that the Government holds the land in trust for the people. In this respect if elected, a BBS government will put as its top priority the passing of the relevant laws that will return all lands to the people of Sarawak.
3.2 To amend the Sarawak Land Code with a view to upgrade the Native Customary Rights land owners from mere licensees to proprietors of land issued with documents of titles and to ensure that all residential leases are converted to grants in perpetuity.
3.3 To introduce smart partnership policy to ensure all land based developments be participated by and for the maximum benefits of land owners and financiers alike.
4. EDUCATION
4.1 To introduce the award of financial aids by the State Government and its agencies to deserving students and enhances text book assistance scheme in order to benefit a greater majority of the middle and low income group.
4.2 To provide annual state grants to all Religious Schools, Mission and Chinese Medium Schools in recognition of their century long contribution to Education in Sarawak.
4.3 To negotiate for sufficient placements for local students in all institutions of higher learning in Sarawak, and to give potential and deserving Sarawak students opportunity for overseas education and training, irrespective of race, culture, creed or religion.
5. ERADICATION OF POVERTY
5.1 To be totally committed to the eradication of rural and urban poverty and to narrow the economic gap between the rich and the poor by way of expanding the economic cake and ensuring fair and equitable distribution of business and job opportunities.
6. HOUSING
6.1 To establish an efficient housing policy aimed at increasing the production of comfortable low-cost and medium cost houses, to cater for the needs of even the poorest segment of the Rakyat and towards this end ‘a one housing lot per family policy’ shall be adopted.
7. INFRASTRUCTURE
7.1 If Malaysia’s vision of attaining a developed status by 2020 is to have any meaning, then roads and basic infrastructure and amenities should reach every village in Sarawak by then since development is a right, not a privilege, of all Sarawakians.
8. AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES AND OTHER SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRIES
8.1 To intensify the use of natural resources such as petroleum, natural gas, timber, agriculture produce and marine resources in the development of small and medium industries.
8.2 To intensify the use of science and technology as catalysts in industrial development.
8.3 To set up more training centres to train local entrepreneurs to enable them to take advantage of the tremendous opportunities in the fields of Agriculture and Fishing and other industries.
8.4 To increase financial assistance to local farmers and fishermen and entrepreneurs involved in small and medium industries.
9. NATURAL RESOURCES
9.1 To review and renegotiate the existing agreement with the Federal Government to enable the State to have a greater share and control of the rich petroleum resources.
9.2 To review and examine existing policy and practice relating to issuance of timber licences to guarantee maximum benefit from these rich resources goes to the Government instead of undeserving politically connected individuals.
10. LABOUR
10.1 To ensure Sarawakians enjoy all the benefits that all other Malaysians have, the Sarawak Labour Ordinance should be implemented without any delay and full and proper protection accorded our workers (at all times).
11. REVIEW OF ALL LAWS
11.1 To expedite examination of all State Legislations and to repeal all unjust laws.
11.2 To re-amend the Interpretation Ordinance in order to reinstate the Dayak Races as Natives of Sarawak.
12. GENERAL MATTERS
12.1 To ensure and promote firm State-Federal relationship in the governance of Sarawak and its people, based on the true spirit of cooperation and mutual respect, fully acknowledging the roles, rights and responsibilities of each as enshrined in the Federal and State Constitutions.
12.2 To re-affirm the true spirit of the 20 Point Agreement when Sarawak formed Malaysia with the territories of Malaya and the North Borneo (Sabah).
12.3 To ensure that development fund approved by the Federal Government for a specific project be utilized for that project and not diverted to unapproved purposes.
A VOTE FOR THE BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK IS A VOTE FOR A NEW SARAWAK!!!
Those were the text of the Declaration and the Manifesto of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak. Together they could be said to lay the blue print of our Vision for a New Sarawak!
Of a New Sarawak that will be one for all Sarawakians, and one where there will be justice, freedom and equality of treatment, fair distribution of wealth and equal opportunity for all Sarawakians irrespective of race, culture, creed or religion.
As the flag bearer and the representative of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak in this August House, I would like to take this opportunity to proclaim for the solemn and permanent records of this August House the Declaration and the Manifesto of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (as a foot note I would like also to inform this August House that I am one of the proud authors of both the said documents):
THE BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK DECLARATION
Whereas according to the Nine Cardinal Principles as bequeathed by the Rajahs, and which have been honoured by the British Colonial Government*, Sarawak is the Heritage of all Sarawakians and is only held in trust by the Government of the Day for them,
Whereas despite the fact that we have been independent and self governing for 40 over years, Sarawakians have increasingly been denied and deprived of the rights that have been granted to them by the previous governments of Sarawak,
We the undersigned parties representing our respective parties do hereby solemnly and sincerely declare and do pledge that:
We as loyal and patriotic Sarawakians have come together in common cause and to struggle for our beloved state of Sarawak
We will struggle to restore and to return all the rights and privileges that rightly belong to all Sarawakians, and which have been progressively taken away by the Barisan National government
We will not detract or stray from our noble cause no matter what, and until our objectives we have set for Sarawak have been achieved
Towards this objective we have formed the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (BBS) and will in due course register and contest under a common logo and common manifesto
To ensure the success of our set objectives, we shall work with all like minded parties and individuals who share our objectives
We shall work under a sharing and collective leadership which will ensure that no races or regions in Sarawak will ever be neglected or forgotten again.
Dated this 6th day of May 2006
(signed) (signed) (signed)
------------------------------ -------------------------------- ---------------------------
Hj Wan Zainal Abidin Edwin Dundang ak Bugak Nicholas Bawing ak
Bin Wan Senusi Anggat
Chairman, Liaison Committee, President, Protem President,
Parti KeADILan Rakyat Sarawak National Party Malaysian Dayak Congress
*According to Tan Sri Datuk Ong Kee Hui in the first volume of his Memoirs “Footprints in Sarawak”, the Nine Cardinal Principles were embodied in the 1941 Constitution of Sarawak and Accepted by the British Government in 1946.
MANIFESTO OF BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK
Barisan Bersatu Sarawak consists of 3 component Parties: Sarawak National Party, Parti KeAdilan Rakyat and Malaysian Dayak Congress, and is open to and embraces All Sarawakians committed to bringing about changes to the political environment in Sarawak.
1. THE MISSION OF BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK
1.1 To build a New Sarawak that will be one for all Sarawakians, and allow them to assume their rightful and proud position in the Malaysian entity.
1.2 To ensure justice, freedom and equality of treatment, fair distribution of wealth and equal opportunity for all Sarawakians irrespective of race, culture, creed or religion.
2. SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT
2.1 To establish a clean, fair, truly democratic and transparent government and one devoid of corruption, nepotism and abuse of power.
2.2 To restructure the State Civil Service with the objective of ensuring optimum transparency and accountability in the running of the State Administration.
2.3 To implement a ruling limiting the tenure of office of the Chief Minister to a period not exceeding 10 years as part of the strategy to prevent corruption and abuse of power by anyone entrusted to serve in that capacity.
3. LAND
3.1 We, the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak (BBS) acknowledge and recognise that all lands in Sarawak belong to the people and that the Government holds the land in trust for the people. In this respect if elected, a BBS government will put as its top priority the passing of the relevant laws that will return all lands to the people of Sarawak.
3.2 To amend the Sarawak Land Code with a view to upgrade the Native Customary Rights land owners from mere licensees to proprietors of land issued with documents of titles and to ensure that all residential leases are converted to grants in perpetuity.
3.3 To introduce smart partnership policy to ensure all land based developments be participated by and for the maximum benefits of land owners and financiers alike.
4. EDUCATION
4.1 To introduce the award of financial aids by the State Government and its agencies to deserving students and enhances text book assistance scheme in order to benefit a greater majority of the middle and low income group.
4.2 To provide annual state grants to all Religious Schools, Mission and Chinese Medium Schools in recognition of their century long contribution to Education in Sarawak.
4.3 To negotiate for sufficient placements for local students in all institutions of higher learning in Sarawak, and to give potential and deserving Sarawak students opportunity for overseas education and training, irrespective of race, culture, creed or religion.
5. ERADICATION OF POVERTY
5.1 To be totally committed to the eradication of rural and urban poverty and to narrow the economic gap between the rich and the poor by way of expanding the economic cake and ensuring fair and equitable distribution of business and job opportunities.
6. HOUSING
6.1 To establish an efficient housing policy aimed at increasing the production of comfortable low-cost and medium cost houses, to cater for the needs of even the poorest segment of the Rakyat and towards this end ‘a one housing lot per family policy’ shall be adopted.
7. INFRASTRUCTURE
7.1 If Malaysia’s vision of attaining a developed status by 2020 is to have any meaning, then roads and basic infrastructure and amenities should reach every village in Sarawak by then since development is a right, not a privilege, of all Sarawakians.
8. AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES AND OTHER SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRIES
8.1 To intensify the use of natural resources such as petroleum, natural gas, timber, agriculture produce and marine resources in the development of small and medium industries.
8.2 To intensify the use of science and technology as catalysts in industrial development.
8.3 To set up more training centres to train local entrepreneurs to enable them to take advantage of the tremendous opportunities in the fields of Agriculture and Fishing and other industries.
8.4 To increase financial assistance to local farmers and fishermen and entrepreneurs involved in small and medium industries.
9. NATURAL RESOURCES
9.1 To review and renegotiate the existing agreement with the Federal Government to enable the State to have a greater share and control of the rich petroleum resources.
9.2 To review and examine existing policy and practice relating to issuance of timber licences to guarantee maximum benefit from these rich resources goes to the Government instead of undeserving politically connected individuals.
10. LABOUR
10.1 To ensure Sarawakians enjoy all the benefits that all other Malaysians have, the Sarawak Labour Ordinance should be implemented without any delay and full and proper protection accorded our workers (at all times).
11. REVIEW OF ALL LAWS
11.1 To expedite examination of all State Legislations and to repeal all unjust laws.
11.2 To re-amend the Interpretation Ordinance in order to reinstate the Dayak Races as Natives of Sarawak.
12. GENERAL MATTERS
12.1 To ensure and promote firm State-Federal relationship in the governance of Sarawak and its people, based on the true spirit of cooperation and mutual respect, fully acknowledging the roles, rights and responsibilities of each as enshrined in the Federal and State Constitutions.
12.2 To re-affirm the true spirit of the 20 Point Agreement when Sarawak formed Malaysia with the territories of Malaya and the North Borneo (Sabah).
12.3 To ensure that development fund approved by the Federal Government for a specific project be utilized for that project and not diverted to unapproved purposes.
A VOTE FOR THE BARISAN BERSATU SARAWAK IS A VOTE FOR A NEW SARAWAK!!!
Those were the text of the Declaration and the Manifesto of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak. Together they could be said to lay the blue print of our Vision for a New Sarawak!
Of a New Sarawak that will be one for all Sarawakians, and one where there will be justice, freedom and equality of treatment, fair distribution of wealth and equal opportunity for all Sarawakians irrespective of race, culture, creed or religion.
1.) TEXT OF THE MAIDEN SPEECH OF DOMINIQUE NG KIM HO, THE MEMBER FOR PADUNGAN, IN THE DUN OF SARAWAK 26 JULY 2006
Tuan Speaker,
I. PREAMBLE
Thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to address this August Assembly and to participate in the Motions of Thanks for the Address of the TYT. It is with the deepest of humility and the greatest of honour that I assume this heavy yet most noble responsibility, that of representing the people of Sarawak from the seat which is my birth place and my home town, of Padungan.
I also note with the greatest of pride that I am the first duly elected YB from my Party, Parti KeADILan Rakyat, to take my place in this August House. Even though Parti KeADILan Rakyat is a very young party indeed in Sarawakian politics and this only the 2nd time we have participated in a Sarawak State elections, already it has shown that it can win the confidence, respect and trust of the people of Sarawak. Even more significantly is that it can win in an overwhelmingly Chinese majority (over 90% Chinese) constituency, thus dispelling once and for all that Parti KeADILan Rakyat is a Malay party or worse, that it is a Muslim party, as some mischievous parties were wont to distort during the elections.
For the very first time in the short political history of Sarawak we are witnessing the emergence of a new Sarawak Political Alliance, that of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak. And this Barisan Bersatu Sarawak is a Barisan that will one day, God Willing, replace the BN as the government of Sarawak as surely as the fact that the day will follow the night and replace the darkness of the BN rule with the sunshine brought by the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak, and as surely as the sun will rise in the east and set in the west!
The possibility of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak replacing the BN? You might laugh and even deride. Yes the DAP is not with us yet. Yes there are only 2 of us and true even as we speak, we might be reduced to only 1. But the DAP too started with only 1 in the last election. Look at them today. There are 6 of them now in this August Chamber. I call them the Magnificent 6 because every one of them has proven to be a very ardent and dedicated advocate of the people that they represent. Who knows by the next round they would be 16! So is it so impossible a feat? Everyone in and outside Sarawak thought that the Opposition would be wiped out again in the recent elections. Or at most get only 1 or 2 seats. As we did in the last elections. But against all predictions and against all odds the opposition has prevailed, nay and even caused an upset victory, instead. It was in all accounts a political earth quake in Sarawak, and in Kuching, it was a political tsunami, wiping out all but one of the 5 seats held by the SUPP!
The victory in Kuching for the opposition is particularly sweet and historic for this is the first time in some 30 years that the opposition has won in a Kuching state seat. The last time there was a victory esp in Padungan was in 1974 when Tan Sri Datuk Stephen Yong Kuet Tze the founder of the SUPP lost to a relatively unknown SNAP candidate by the name of Lo Foot Kee.
As for the magnificent victory of the DAP, my first party, over the SUPP in Pending, it could almost be said as being an impossible feat. Who would have expected Datuk Sim Kheng Hui a long time veteran and strong man of SUPP, who had won his previous elections with majorities in the thousands, and the last time with a 6000 vote majority over me and Voon Lee Shan, to have lost this round and with a thumping majority of 4372, a turn around of some 10,000 votes!
In politics if my over 20 years involvement has taught me anything, it is that nothing in politics is impossible and that nothing can be taken for granted. Indeed politics is all about the art of the possible and of turning impossibilities into realities.
I. PREAMBLE
Thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to address this August Assembly and to participate in the Motions of Thanks for the Address of the TYT. It is with the deepest of humility and the greatest of honour that I assume this heavy yet most noble responsibility, that of representing the people of Sarawak from the seat which is my birth place and my home town, of Padungan.
I also note with the greatest of pride that I am the first duly elected YB from my Party, Parti KeADILan Rakyat, to take my place in this August House. Even though Parti KeADILan Rakyat is a very young party indeed in Sarawakian politics and this only the 2nd time we have participated in a Sarawak State elections, already it has shown that it can win the confidence, respect and trust of the people of Sarawak. Even more significantly is that it can win in an overwhelmingly Chinese majority (over 90% Chinese) constituency, thus dispelling once and for all that Parti KeADILan Rakyat is a Malay party or worse, that it is a Muslim party, as some mischievous parties were wont to distort during the elections.
For the very first time in the short political history of Sarawak we are witnessing the emergence of a new Sarawak Political Alliance, that of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak. And this Barisan Bersatu Sarawak is a Barisan that will one day, God Willing, replace the BN as the government of Sarawak as surely as the fact that the day will follow the night and replace the darkness of the BN rule with the sunshine brought by the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak, and as surely as the sun will rise in the east and set in the west!
The possibility of the Barisan Bersatu Sarawak replacing the BN? You might laugh and even deride. Yes the DAP is not with us yet. Yes there are only 2 of us and true even as we speak, we might be reduced to only 1. But the DAP too started with only 1 in the last election. Look at them today. There are 6 of them now in this August Chamber. I call them the Magnificent 6 because every one of them has proven to be a very ardent and dedicated advocate of the people that they represent. Who knows by the next round they would be 16! So is it so impossible a feat? Everyone in and outside Sarawak thought that the Opposition would be wiped out again in the recent elections. Or at most get only 1 or 2 seats. As we did in the last elections. But against all predictions and against all odds the opposition has prevailed, nay and even caused an upset victory, instead. It was in all accounts a political earth quake in Sarawak, and in Kuching, it was a political tsunami, wiping out all but one of the 5 seats held by the SUPP!
The victory in Kuching for the opposition is particularly sweet and historic for this is the first time in some 30 years that the opposition has won in a Kuching state seat. The last time there was a victory esp in Padungan was in 1974 when Tan Sri Datuk Stephen Yong Kuet Tze the founder of the SUPP lost to a relatively unknown SNAP candidate by the name of Lo Foot Kee.
As for the magnificent victory of the DAP, my first party, over the SUPP in Pending, it could almost be said as being an impossible feat. Who would have expected Datuk Sim Kheng Hui a long time veteran and strong man of SUPP, who had won his previous elections with majorities in the thousands, and the last time with a 6000 vote majority over me and Voon Lee Shan, to have lost this round and with a thumping majority of 4372, a turn around of some 10,000 votes!
In politics if my over 20 years involvement has taught me anything, it is that nothing in politics is impossible and that nothing can be taken for granted. Indeed politics is all about the art of the possible and of turning impossibilities into realities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
